Re: New lit loadings

[rddesign@wolfenet.com (Ric & Denisse Hedman)]

>> From kgstar@most.fw.hac.com Tue Jul 23 20:40:29 1996
>> 
>> At 7:56 PM 7/23/96, Zenon Kulpa wrote:
>> >> From kgstar@most.fw.hac.com Tue Jul 23 17:30:00 1996
>> >>
>> >> As you probably know, I've been working up some stuff for LIT.  Well I've
>> >> just uploaded a bunch of it.  New home pages for LITY, Marine sciences,
>> >> near earth development, and central library, member lists, etc.. etc...
>> >> Please take a look.
>> >>
>> >> http://165.254.130.90/LIT/
>> >>
>> >You asked for that... ;-))
>> >
>> >1. The URL above loads the "Hi there" text and nothing more
>> >   (as does your LIT imagemap).
>> >   One must do some guesswork to add "index.html" to the address...
>> 
>> Opps.  Try.
>> 
>> http://165.254.130.90/LIT/index.html
>> 
>Yes, I had already figured it out 
>(as you should have seen from my text above...)
>
>
>> >3. Some texts on your LIT imagemap are too small/too low contrast,
>> >   hence hardly readable.
>> 
>> Do you mean the tree on the bottom of the pages?
>> 
>Exactly.
>
>
>> >4. Congratulations! - you must have worked reeeelly hard:
>> >   the number of spelling errors is an order of magnitude less
>> >   that your usual share... ;-)
>> 
>> ???  I though I forgot to even spell check it?
>> 
>Really??? Miracles happen...  ;-)
>
>
>> >And be prepared for another round of Kelly-bashing
>> >concerning the one-way missions... ;-))
>> 
>> :)  Oooo.  Freash meat.
>> 
>> I could never figure out where you were coming from on the pro kamakazi
>> flights.  Over here were hard pressed to get permision to deliberatly risk
>> solder lives in combat.  Expending them for anything short of saving a U.S.
>> city is unthinkable.
>> 
>> In my cynical periods, I figured you'ld been under the Soviet thumb for too
>> long.
>> 
>There may be something in it - 
>we here must still have some fighting trim left 
>(you coke-drinking, couch-potato-lying decadents... ;-))
>
>Seriously, though, my problem with this discussion was
>that you seemingly were not able to, or do not want to,
>understandand the GREAT difference between one-way missions 
>and suicide missions. Only the latter are "kamikaze";
>the former are simply cosmic-distance relocations -
>I do not see any suicidal elements in them.
>So budling both types of missions under "one-way" heading
>and then discussing them together as if both were same-type
>suicidal missions (as you do in your Progress Report) 
>really infuriates me, as simply unfair arguing practice...
>
>-- Zenon
...........................................................................
I have to agree with Zenon on this........one way means you are setting up
housekeeping at the other end......One way means you can keep sending
research data...daily, weekly, monthly, or what ever......

What would have been the results of the new world, (don't even argue that
you could go back)....most folks , like my grandparents, knew they could
NEVER go home again......they were leaving EVERYTHING
FOREVER.......................

Yhis concept shouldn't be eliminated.............

Ric
Visit RD Designs Home Page at:..http://www.wolfenet.com/~rddesign/Rddesign.htm