[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problems with beaming
- To: KellySt@aol.com, kgstar@most.fw.hac.com, stevev@efn.org, jim@bogie2.bio.purdue.edu, zkulpa@zmit1.ippt.gov.pl, hous0042@maroon.tc.umn.edu, rddesign@wolfenet.com, David@InterWorld.com, lparker@destin.gulfnet.com, DotarSojat@aol.com
- Subject: Re: Problems with beaming
- From: T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwente.nl (Timothy van der Linden)
- Date: Mon, 08 Apr 1996 12:02:37 +0100
To Rex,
>work) due to diffraction. I don't have the explicit relations
>at home, but I believe that the angular width of a "diffraction-
>limited" beam at half maximum is the same as that used in the
>Rayleigh criterion: 1.22 lambda/D.
"Angular width" is that in radians?
Timothy