Re: Re: Summary

[KellySt@aol.com]

>> Good summary, but what do you mean Military applications?  What the hell
>> would the military do with big fixed Electromagnetic cannon?  Its just a
>> scaled up version of what they are building now!
>

>No, you mis-understood, I meant that the military would 
>like to have fusion technology to power subs and
> space-vessels.  The fuel launcher is capable of being 
> built with today's tech.

Oh, your right I didn't understand. 
 
>> ] 2) the MARS: (SOL > {maser sail} > mid-way point > {Lineac drive} > TC)
>> 
>> ] maser sail needed for return is easier to repair than fuel 
>> ] launcher.
>> 
>> But is the maser array easier to repair then a fuel launcher?

> No, and I said as much in my message.  I think a fuel 
> launcher would be easier to build than a solar array/maser
> array

Missed that too.  Opps.

Ok, no disagreements then.

Kelly