Paper #1 (Due Nov. 27. One page, typed, 250 words)

Please choose one of the following topics and write a one page paper in which you focus on ONE idea about one of the readings so far. You will need to introduce the author and work, and you will need a good thesis, i.e., an assertion with an argumentative edge that requires you to present and discuss evidence to support it. Your evidence will come in the form of a quotation from one of the texts. For example, if I were to write about "A Hunger Artist, " this is how my paper might start:

Kafka's "A Hunger Artist" presents a strange entertainer who starves himself to make a living.  As odd as this occupation might seem, Kafka's narrator presents it as almost normal.  By the end of the story we realize that the audience that is entertained by this starvation, not the starvation itself, is the object of Kafka's contempt.

After this beginning, I will need to find some evidence to support my assertion that Kafka has contempt for the people who gawk at the Hunger Artist.  I find it near the end, where the people stream by, oblivious of the Hunger Artist, occasionally belligerent, then don't even notice when he dies, and really love the panther.

Toward the end of the story, after the Hunger Artist's career has stalled and he has joined a circus, he finds himself in a cage outside the menangerie. At first he is pleased to have so many people stream by, but then he realizes that they hardly notice him and that he is just an impediment on the way to the next animal exhibit. We hardly know what to think of this audience reaction until we reach the end of the story, where the Hunger Artist dies and is replaced by a panther. The audience is enthralled by this new exhibit: "his noble body, furnished almost to the bursting point with all that it needed, seemed to carry freedom around with it too; somewhere in his jaws it seemed to lurk" (177). Here the irony of seeing a caged animal as enjoying his freedom and even locating freedom in the jaw (as if to eat is to be free) overpowers the reader with contempt for the shallow, thrill-seeking public.

I would finish off my paper with a paragraph in which I consider the implications of this contempt for the audience. Is this how Kafka feels about his own readers? Or about the people who don't read his work? Or about how people react to art in general?

This page was designed by Moira Burke and is maintained by Sharon Schuman.