Lecture plan
Views
On Depression and Marriage
I. Concurrent association
B. 50% of couples seeking marital therapy have
significant depression
D. Based on 3,000 interview --
Risk same for men and women, but 2
times more W than M
classified as depressed
E. 1993 study: 328 newly marrieds
MD spouse 10 times greater risk than
NMD spouse for depression
Same finding controlling for other
spouse's MS and Depression
F. Improving depression not increase DAS
G. Treating depression does NOT improve relationship
B. 1993 study of 50 women with recent significant
negative
marital events (NME) (abuse,
affairs):
Excluded W with prior major
depressive episode:
36% of the women with NME showed
major depressive episode
NOTE:
36% >> than point prevalence which is 7 - 8 %
Also, >> self-reported attributions
(between event and depression)
III. Causal Role: Prospective
Findings
T-1: r = -.35 T-2: r = -.56
T-2 >> T-1
C. Different study:
Weiss's MSI predicted BDI 2
years later, DAS did not!
DAS predicted measures of anxiety
Severe entrenched conflict predicts
to BDI
D. Recent studies:
Husband premarital dysphoria
--> Marital Distress
MD could be correlated with
choice of an unreliable partner
E. Summary:
Marital Distress ---> Depression
What do depressed couples DO, rather than what do they say
B. Sequential Analyses:
Does depressed W behavior reduce
probability that H
will respond aggressively?
For Depressed-Distressed group
--
W depressive behavior --> REDUCTION
of H aggressive
behaviors BUT--- the suppression
effect is a function of
years married; true for briefer
relationships, not for longer
Long term marital discord is
the key to depression!
B. Specific Cognitive Errors: MADOPS
With depressed spouses one often
sees evidence for these fallacies
of thought:
M
Magnification and minimization
Event far more/less significant
A
Arbitrary inference
Specific conclusion no supporting facts
D
Dichotomous thinking
Either/or experience
O
Over generalization
General rule from single instance; applying it too broadly
P
Personalization
Attributing
external events to self
S
Selective abstraction
Conceptualizing a situation on basis of detail taken out of context
For an extended list of thinking errors, please visit THINKING
C.
Attributional style dynamics (review)
Internal-External
Fincham, Beach, Harold, and Osborne (1997) Psychological Science, 8, 351-357.
I. The Study
C. Stability: Time 1 to Time 2
Satisfaction (DAS) and Depression
(BDI) quite stable:
DAS T1 to T2: .61 and .56 (H
& W, respectively)
BDI T1 to T2: .56 and .45 (H
& W, respectively)
D. Concurrent: DAS vs. BDI
Time 1 to 1: -.28 and .-45 (H
& W, respectively)
Time 2 to 2: -.48 and -.57 (H
& W, respectively
E. Cross Lagged rs: Time 1 to Time 2 [ Not a causal
model ]
For Wives--
Only
uni-directional influence , their initial DAS predicted their
subsequent
BDI (DAS · BDI)
And --
Effect
of BDI --> DAS STRONGER for Husbands than for Wives
Beach, S. R. H., Sandeen E. E., &
O'Leary, K. D. (1990). Depression
in Marriage:
A Model Etiology and Treatment. NY: Guilford Press
Steven Beach found empirical support
in the literature for the following
factors associated with depression
in marriage:
Absence of --
Return to 473 |