Identifying
Some Key Ideas from Readings about each Model
A. Object relations perspective
What
does object refer to?
Introjected
objects?
Collusion
as unconscious agreement
Ambivalence
Intrapsychic
awareness
Transference
B . Self-Psychology perspective
Narcissistic vulnerability
2. Behavioral/Social Learning Model (based on Halford et al)
What characterizes the dyadic
or behavioral focus to couples?
What does "dyadic focus" refer
to?
How does this approach (self-regulation)
differ from the psychodynamic approaches?
What do "generalization effects"
refer to when discussing marital therapy?
Compare this approach with the
OMSP model presented in lecture:
are they compatible
with one another or are they vastly different?
3. Systems Approaches (Family as a Psychosocial System)
This article introduces a new set of vocabulary terms
and a different way to view how
relationships are organized. Become familiar with the
terms and as you read try to think
up examples to fit the constructs they offer. Lecture
materials will follow the chapter
closely.
This is the most difficult article you be reading for this
course. It is here because
it introduces you to some major ideas, and it describes major theories
that you
will find necessary throughout the course. The outline below will help
you focus
on what is important.
2. K & B first describe some
possible theories (models) of marriage (e.,g., social
exchange and behavior theories that we will also cover
in lecture). They spell out what
each theory does well and what each does not do well
(i.e., does or does not explain change).
3. Next step, they (K&B) looked
at all the published empirical longitudinal studies (115
of them!) and found what the studies tell us about (a)
constructs, (b) independent variables
(IVs) and (c) dependent variables (DVs) (Who did the
study, how many subjects etc.
are not important to us at this time.) Thus, looking
at the columns in their table one
sees the range of DVs (constructs related to satisfaction
and stability). These are the
constructs that we will want to know more about throughout
this course.
4. K&B then evaluate the
methodological strengths and weaknesses of the
studies taken as a whole. If there are method problems
we will have less faith in
their findings. Seems reasonable. But the list --like
their review article-- is very long!
5. Then they take the findings
they have sifted out, like flour, and try to
describe their own model of marriage and marital change
based on the facts that survived
their critiques. Note: this is precisely how we work
in Psychology: get the empirical data
and use it to construct a model. If the model leads to
testable hypotheses it is good;
we can then find out whether hypotheses from the
model are supported or refuted.
Ideas must be testable (refutable) for them to
be useful in behavioral science!
6. Their
model of change involves pathways. They point out how different
sets of variables should lead to predictable outcomes.
Paths involve sequences
--follow the bouncing ball! What influences marital stability?
Marital quality?
Many things. How? Usually through sequence of combinations
(e.g., something
leads to stress, but how stress is handled is more important
than absolute amount
of stress, etc. etc.). Pathways are like mediators,
they indicate how effects are changed
as a result of intervening variables.
7. "How
should I study this article?" After seeing the logic (as
spelled out above)
get a sense of the constructs described by each of the
theories. Get a sense of how people
have studied relationships (self-report vs. behavioral
observation). Try to follow the steps
of the model K&B propose by working through the sequences
(some sequences feed
backwards, which is OK).
8. Section I of the course is
designed to familiarize you with constructs that will form the
basis for the rest of the course. Your awareness of the
different marital theories is important.
Return to Section I |