|
Another Perspective
The Art of the Soapbox
The best lack all conviction while the worst are filled with passionate
intensity.
-William Butler Yeats
What understanding or intelligence have they? They put their trust in
popular bards and take the mob for their teacher, unaware that most people
are bad, and few are good.
-Heraclitus
By Brian Roberts
You'll see them everywhere you go these days: signs that read "Under
Construction", "Construction Zone", or more simply, "Workers." These
beacons of incomplete serviceability are transient: the point at which the
eyesore begins to blend into the landscape is the very point at which it
disappears, the work completed, to be propped up again at some
inconveniently nearby location. I've been asked by my editors to address
this phenomenon as it pertains to the construction of the Another
Perspective column; like any grateful employee, I said, "Yes, boss,
shakin' it, boss"; like any average construction worker, I have spent as
much time scratching my ass and patronizing the vending machine as I have
laying brick, and am now an impressive two days past my completion
deadline.
Deadline, schmeadline. I've been an English major at this school for three
years now, and there has yet to be a professor for whom I've turned in
every paper on time-no editor is any different. This is far more sick than
any simple disrespect for authority, mind you. Professor Jim Boren said it
best in a lecture a couple years ago with the quip that lateness for class
is an indication of neurosis. Today I learned that according to the
philosopher Martin Heidegger, any fixation on a particular way of being
constitutes neurosis, so I scrawled into my notebook that in this age of
technology and specialization, all modern life is neurotic. Sitting now
before a Pentium, with two dictionaries and enough Hamm's to drown a
kodiak, I am a thoroughly modern man.
The OC's AP columnist is traditionally characterized by a disdain for
deadlines, and if there is any precedent to observe, it is the one set by
those fearless souls who have gone before me in risking sanity and
reputation on this faux battlefront in the "war of ideas". If I were
J. Pierson I would have begun this column by relating to you some
idiosyncrasy of your campus radio station. If I were Chris Kantrowitz I
would have mentioned that I only write in the nude, an assertion augmented
with a little something in Latin. If I were Judah McAuley I might have
brought in the big guns by interviewing that famously outspoken
personality, my own self. If I were Michael Atkinson I'd narrate to you my
last vacation in Hunter S. Thompsonese. I've tried to co-opt each of their
acts in the name of paying my dues to the discipline, and endeavored to do
so in my own voice, without shouting too loudly or whispering too softly,
but I can't get over the feeling that I've been standing on a stack of
boxes of Dial, speaking Swahili into the wind.
It seems to be a condition of this enterprise that someone who thinks he
has an idea or two will lay them down in what he considers to be a
creative combination of words, as if through strength of rhetoric and
conviction he will cause those ideas to become other people's truths,
after which said other people will react, for the most part, by not
reacting. I base this impression on two observations: 1) whenever I read
the columns other people are writing-opinion, personal experience,
whatever-here on this campus or in national publications, I tend to find
myself flooded with indifference, awash in wonder as to why someone would
want to relate such subjective triviality to people one doesn't know,
vaguely tremulous that people unknown to me might look at my column with
the same diminishing eye I can't help but lend to others', and 2) the only
feedback I've been able to elicit regarding this column is from people who
know me personally and read a lot anyway, who say as little as possible
about whatever topic I attempted to address. A couple days ago a friend
said something like this: "Well, you've got the art of the soapbox down to
a, an, um... well, you've got the art of the soapbox, all right."
What I realized when he said that was that if there is any imperative to
this kind of work it is that one build oneself a durable and attractive
soapbox stand before getting up to preach. When I undertook this project
in October I pledged to do two things: to make fun of all your fruity
costumes and to champion the cause of Self-Referentiality in
Journalism. Now I must admit that I haven't come close to performing those
duties. First of all, the only fruity costumes I've been able to get
inside are my own. Secondly, this piece may be riddled, like so much these
days, with first-person pronouns, but in no way does it constitute
journalism. This is more like Proto-Literary Masturbation. I am the worker
who shows up late to the site and spends the day in the tool shed with the
company porn, to emerge at quitting time spewing some line about having
been drawing up plans for the next project.
As far as that next project goes, it is expected to be apolitical in
nature. If a person's life may be represented, as Robert Frost has
intimated, by a walk through a wood, it's fair to say that the only thing
that keeps me walking is the hope that I will soon reach a waterfall or
something to validate the tedium of trudging through miles and miles of
pine. In my anxiety to find such an oasis, I have always been one to
investigate side paths, to see if I can learn the indicators of trails
that lead to waterfalls. Somehow, at some point, I came to a fork in the
path of consciousness and took the trail with a sign that read: "Politics
is a compelling and meaningful truth-finding endeavor for intelligent
people." I've been covering my tracks ever since in the vain attempt to
aright my mistake, losing myself ever-deeper in the forest of banality.
So here I am tacking paragraphs together with the hope that they will look
sufficiently unlike a soapbox to be safely employed as one. If ever you
should find yourself constructing a similar monstrosity, be sure to have
the necessary materials: a handful of forgotten utterances of dead people,
a couple pints of vitriol, and a hundred yards of irony with which to mask
all the vitriol-the last thing you want is someone knowing how you really
feel. If you have any of these things to work with, and you think you
might be able to it use them to construct a platform on which to say
something that will mean something to someone, all I can tell you is that
I wish you better luck than I have had.
Brian Roberts, a senior majoring in English is a featured columnist for
theOregon Commetator.
|