Editorial
Something Really Stupid This Way Comes
To date, the ASUO has been lucky enough to avoid the kind of flat-out,
full-scale, three-alarm debacle that it specializes in. Don't sigh with
relief yet - there's a term-and-a-half left, and elections are just around
the corner.
This year, ASUO elections are being held in February, as opposed to the
traditional March-April stretch.
The reason for this lies in a rule change affecting the date that the
recommendation for incidental fees - the platelets in the lifeblood of
student government - must be submitted to the state of Oregon. No
matter; the result will be the same. The result is always the same.
Stupidity will reign.
Stupidity reigns in the form of a flurry of grievances that rarely change
the outcome of the election.
Stupidity reigns in the overuse of the phrases "accessibility," "student
rights," "diversity," and any number of other vague buzzwords used by
candidates who have no intention of following through on their promises.
Stupidity reigns in the form of joke candidates whose main purpose is to
amuse themselves and cause as much of a headache for the Elections Board
as humanly possible. Stupidity reigns everywhere, though this year, you
can expect to see stupidity in a number of interesting places.
Some four years after the Elections Board's first attempt to hold
elections online, the ASUO has finally got it figured out. They think.
Last year, after a handful of students discovered that, with a little
sleight-of-hand, they could vote as many times as they wanted to in the
primaries, the online voting option was called off, and votes in the
general election were counted the old-fashioned way.
With a history as illustrious behind them, the hubris behind the Elections
Board's decision to take voting online exclusively is a risky gambit at
best, and flat-out stupid at worst.
Further complicating matters is the oft-tested rule barring all
campaigning within fifty feet of a voting booth, which presents a set of
likely disaster scenarios separate from the already tenuous networking and
maintenance difficulties which thwarted the 96-97 online process.
Technically, now that all voting is done through DuckWeb, any computer on
the UO campus is a possible voting booth. Will the Board put a volunteer
in every campus computer lab to monitor persuasive screensavers and
websites? Will the employees of each lab take it upon themselves to
monitor a policy which will only distract them from their standard routine
of WarCraft and calculus homework?
Or will anarchy rule? Don't forget - we're talking about Eugene here. ,p %
Speaking of which, how about those anarchists? According to Mayor Jim
Torrey, you're going to school in the "anarchist capital of the world." p
Well, isn't that something?
In any case, they're having enough fun
disrupting the Eugene elections, unless you count Joel Rueber. The
Progressive Slate's absence from the scene this time round the ballot box
is undeniably a good thing, even in light of short-term losses. The best
example, of course, is the initially catastrophic candidate turnout - that
is, until the Elections Board extended the deadline three, count 'em,
three times. Due to this, we are in store for a couple of sure things:
a) Candidates even less worthy of your vote than the already incompetent
candidates of years past.
b) Plaintive editorials from the Emerald bemoaning voter apathy and the
death of democracy.
In related news, there have been nearly as many
departures upstairs at everyone's favorite stepping stone to a dead-end
career in journalism, the Ol' Dirty Emerald.
The faces of the trained monkeys have changed, but it hasn't pulled the
Emerald out of the tired, uninspired abyss Editor Laura Cadiz has bravely
led the staff into. New trained monkeys are still trained monkeys.
While the student government spins in circles, the Emerald continues to
run plaintive pleas for diversity, recipes as part of their cover stories,
and stubbornly milk the turn of the century in the same manner as they did
their own centennial last year.
Scott Austin, finally, has thrown his hat into the race for the
Executive. Having exhausted all other forms of involvement with the ASUO,
he's finally going big time. Whether he wins the popular vote of his peers
or is decisively crushed by Sinister Students United for Left-Handed
Rights candidate Dan Atkinson, only time will tell. Truth told, Austin's
infamous past with the ASUO makes it difficult to assess this in such a
way as to satisfy everyone. Perhaps if they learn to ignore him, he will
go away. On the other hand, it probably wouldn't make a difference.
Well, that's it. If the incoherent manner of this editorial has your
head spinning, then just wait for the bloody thing to get under way.
Have your grievance forms handy.
|