Course Home Page |
|
There are two major graded assignments and two minor graded assignment in this course.
The number and nature of the graded activities for the course will be somewhat "emergent." Thus, while the ideas given below will guide course assessment, there may well be changes to, additions to, or deletions from the activities discussed below. Here is a "first draft" of the number of points that are available on the various graded activities that are initially being planned for the course.
|
Points |
|
Attendance; Readings Quizzes. (8 quizzes @ 3; 9 attendances @ 3). |
51 |
|
All components of Roles of ICT in Problem Solving (the "Tuesday" class meetings). |
100 |
|
All components of Hit the Road Running Project. |
60 |
|
All components of team term projects on Roles of ICT in Specific Disciplines. This includes both written materials and the end of term presentation to the class. |
60 |
|
Paper on ICT and TAG Education |
15 |
|
End of term Exit Interview |
15 |
| Total Points |
301
|
Course grades will be based on the percent of points earned. The (tentative) grading scale is:
| Percentage | Letter Grade |
| 78% or above | P (Pass) on a P/N Basis |
| 78% to (but not including) 80% | B minus |
| 80% to (but not including) 88% | B |
| 88% to (but not including) 90% | B plus |
| 90% to (but not including) 92% | A minus |
| 92% to 97% | A |
| Above 97% | A plus |
This Term Project is a weekly Electronic Journaling activity. You will be expected to turn in your Electronic Journal as an email attachment a number of times during the termessentially each week starting with the second week. Here are some rough guidelines. More details will emerge through inclass discussions and through you deciding for yourself what you feel is important to include.
Note that 60 points is a lot of points! This means that you should devote a significant amount of time each week on this activity. I am looking for careful, reflective, "deep" thinking. I am expecting that your Electronic Journal will help me to learn more about what you are finding to be useful in the course.
Some General Information About the HTTR Assignment
During the term you have been turning in a journal entry each week and receiving feedback on it. Before you turn in your journal for the last time (due date in Thursday December 2), you will want to go back through your journal and spiff it up. Among other things, this means that you should have a consistent layout and design structure, you should have a completed annotated bibliography at the end of your journal, you should be making appropriate use of styles, you should not be using the word technology when you mean ICT, and so on. Your last entry (for the week ending December 2) should be reflective in nature, and should include a summary of key ideas covered in earlier parts of the journal. As you go back through your journal, you may want to expand on some of the entries. Keep in mind that the overall goal of HTTR is that you have given careful thought on implementation of ideas from the course into your future teaching. Each weeks journal entry is supposed to reflect some of this thinking and to have specific ideas for implementation. As I read and grade your journal, I will be looking for specifics in this area, rather than just broad generalities.
In the Hit the Road Running individual term project, you are writing in your journal each week. The journal entry for the week ending November 18 is a 15-point graded entry. Details are given in the remainder of this section. Note that this 15 points is separate from the total of 60 points for the HTTR individual term project.
The reading assignment for the week ending November 18 is Chapter 8 of Moursunds book, Introduction to Information and Communication Technology in Education. This chapter is ICT in Special and Gifted Education. For your journal entry, write a paper of about 600 to 700 words in length that focuses specifically on ICT and TAG education. The paper should include:
One interesting idea for enrighment is learning one or more additional languages. Of course, regular education students can also be doing this, and this is the basis of bilingual schools.
The class will be divided into teams of approximately two students each. Each team will have a different one of the following general areas:
There are two specific goals for each team:
In summary, your goal is to gain a significant level of practical, useful expertise in ICT within a specific discipline and to share what you have learned.
Here are some ideas that each team must carefully consider. There is no specified length for the final paper, but it must be long enough to carefully cover the ideas in this list.
Make enough copies of your complete paper so that each person in the class can have a copy. The complete papers can be distributed on the last day of class. The short handouts must be distributed before your group begins its presentation.
Typically each class meeting will begin with an Attendance & Reading Quiz. Half of the points are awarded for being in attendance at the time of the quiz. Half of the points are awarded for the content of your written response to the quiz questions. Here is the rubric that is used.
|
and Points |
|
|
|
Level 1: Unexcused absence. Points: 0% |
Student was not present to participate in the in-class activity and was not excused. |
|
|
Level 2: "Present in Class" |
Student was present to participate in the in-class activity and turned in the activity sheet with his/her name in proper format. |
|
|
Level 3: Developing |
Student showed a modest level of knowledge of both the current reading assignment and how it relates to previous topics covered in the class. |
|
|
Level 4: Strong |
Student showed a good level of knowledge of both the current reading assignment and how it relates to previous topics covered in the class. |
|
|
Level 5: Excellent |
Student wrote concise and thoughtful answers reflecting good insight into both the current reading assignment and how it relates to previous topics covered in the class. |
Here are some samples of Attendance and reading Quizzes given in recent years. Note that these were 10 point activities, and that the number of points assigned to these activities is different for Fall Term 2004. Also note that the course content is quite a bit different this year than it has been in the past. Thus, the main value of these examples is to give you some idea of the nature and difficulty of quizzes.
Printed name (Last, First) __________________________________
The reading assignment for last week and this week included the following two editorials written by Moursund:
Moursund, D.G. (August-September 1999). Ten powerful ideas shaping the present and future of IT in education. Editor's Message, Learning and Leading With Technology. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.Moursund, D.G. (October 2000). Roles of ICT in improving our educational system. Part 2: Compelling applications. Editor's Message, Learning and Leading With Technology. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
Select one of these two articles and:
Printed name (Last, First) ___________________________________
As part of the readings for weeks 1 and 2 of this course, you were asked to spend time browsing the following five Web sites:
Eisenhower National Clearinghouse for Mathematics & Science Education [Online]. Accessed 9/20/01: http://www.enc.org/.Federal Resources for Educational Excellence (FREE) [Online]. Accessed 9/20/01: http://www.ed.gov/free/.
Oregon Technology in Education Council (OTEC) [Online]. Accessed 9/20/02: http://otec.uoregon.edu/.
SouthEast Initiatives Regional Technology in Education Consortium [Online]. Accessed 9/20/01: http://www.serve.org/seir-tec/.
U.S. Library of Congress [Online]. Accessed 9/20/01: http://www.loc.gov/.
Select one of the five sites. Discuss its contents in enough depth to show you have reasonable insight into the contents of the site. Also, discuss the contents from a personal, constructivist point of view. That is, explain the meaning of constructivism by illustrating constructivism in action as you browsed the website you have selected and then thought about it again as you are doing this writing.
Printed name (Last, First) _____________________________
There were three reading assignments for this past week:
Lemke, C. and Couglin, E. (1998). Technology in American schools: Seven dimensions for gauging progress [Online].National Educational Technology Standards for Students [Online.) (1998). Eugene, OR: ISTE.
Moursund, D.G. (April 1999). Enhance your opportunities to learn: A different slant on professional development. Learning and Leading With Technology. pp. 4-5. Eugene, OR: ISTE.
Make up a higher order cognitive skills question that is designed to test knowledge of one or more of these readings--and answer it.
Printed name (Last, First) ___________________________________
One of the assigned readings for this week was:
SEIRTEC (May 1999). Factors influencing the effective use of technology for teaching and learning: Lessons learned from the SEIRTEC intensive site schools. SouthEast and Island Regional Technology in Education Consortium. [Online]. Accessed 10/16/01: http://www.serve.org/seir-tec/publications/lessons.html.
Select one Big Idea from this document that seems particular important to you. Select a different Big Idea from the previous weeks of this course that seems particularly important to you. Compare, contrast, and in other ways analyze your two Big Ideas from the point of view of how each might be useful to you (personally) as a teacher working to improve education through appropriate use of ICT.
Printed name (Last, First) __________________________________
Give a careful 4-part definition of the term "well-defined problem" (as defined in the readings for this week). Then give an example of a well-defined problem that you have encountered within the past few months. Explain how your "problem" meets each of the four criteria for a well-defined problem.
Printed name (Last, First) __________________________________
Everett Rogers writes about adoption of innovations. Gordon Moore is known for a "law" predicting the rate of change of chip technology. The readings for this week covered these two topics.
Briefly discuss the work of Rogers and Moore, and then provide some insights into how they relate to our educational system.
Printed name (Last, First) __________________________________
Briefly define what it means when a teacher functions as a "guide on the side" rather than as a "sage on the stage." Then explain how constructivism and how project-based learning related to the two terms "guide on the side" and "sage on the stage."
In this course, a variety of assignments require writing. For each written activity, it is expected that you will make use of appropriate word processing and desktop publication procedures, and that you will turn in electronic copy. Perhaps the two most important aspects of this are: 1) You develop an appropriate "style sheet" for the document you are writing and use it appropriately; and 2) You make use of common desktop publication practices such as a first line indent at the start of a paragraph (not to be accomplished by use of a tab), one blank space between sentences, and no "carriage returrn" types of spacing except for at the end of a paragraph.
The following is a general purpose rubric, lacking details needed to align it with a specific assignment. The idea being put forth here is that an assignment is scored and assigned points on the basis of a rubric. The rubric given below is for a 10-point assignment. A corresponding scaling of points would be used for an assignment with a larger or smaller number of possible points. Note that points will be subtracted for assignments turned in late except when the conditions for "turning in late assignments without loss of points" are met. Note also that "knowledge and skills" being demonstrated in a written assignment include desktop publication, no matter what the specific topic area of the assignment.
|
|
|
|
Level 1: Emergent |
Student displays few, if any, of the rudimentary knowledge and skills that are expected. (Also use this level, and a score of 0, if the assignment is not turned in.) |
|
Level 2: Limited |
Student displays rudimentary knowledge and skills, but often requires substantial individual help and guidance. |
|
Level 3: Developing |
Student displays a minimally adequate level of the expected knowledge and skills. |
|
Level 4: Capable |
Student displays a functional, adequate level of the expected knowledge and skills. |
|
Level 5: Strong |
Student displays a high level of the expected knowledge and skills. |
|
Level 6: Exceptional |
Student displays an outstanding and creative/innovative level of the expected knowledge and skills of word processing and desktop publication. |
Some assignments require you to make an in-class presentation to the whole class. These presentations will be graded on a combination of content, effectiveness of the presentation, appropriate use of multimedia, and hardcopy materials for the audience.
In all such presentations, you are expected to make appropriate and effective use of multimedia presentations aids. Each presenter is expected to demonstrate the ability to set up and use the multimedia.
In a formal presentation to a group it is common to use multimedia and also to have an appropriate hardcopy handout. In this course, we will assume that the in-class presentations that use multimedia will be accompanied by appropriate hardcopy handouts. When preparing your hardcopy handout, be aware that a copy of your "slides" is seldom an adequate handout. That is because slides are designed to accompany and support an oral presentation, while hardcopy is designed to be read without the help of an accompanying oral presentation.
In both the multimedia presentation and the hardcopy handout, your name and contact information (such as email address) should be included.
Details on how we handle the multimedia presentations will emerge as the course progresses. In the past, a class has often had one or more students who were especially competent in setting up multimedia presentation hardware facilities, and these students often did setups for the other students. This is no longer acceptable.
The oral (in class) presentation will be assessed on criteria such as:
The following is a general purpose rubric, lacking details needed to align it with a specific assignment. The idea being put forth here is that an assignment is scored and assigned points on the basis of a rubric. The rubric given below is for a 10-point assignment. A corresponding scaling of points would be used for an assignment with a larger or smaller number of possible points.
|
|
|
|
Level 1: Emergent |
Student displays few, if any, of the rudimentary knowledge and skills that are expected. (Also use this level, and a score of 0, if the assignment is not turned in.) |
|
Level 2: Limited |
Student displays rudimentary knowledge and skills, but often requires substantial individual help and guidance. |
|
Level 3: Developing |
Student displays a minimally adequate level of the expected knowledge and skills. |
|
Level 4: Capable |
Student displays a functional, adequate level of the expected knowledge and skills. |
|
Level 5: Strong |
Student displays a high level of the expected knowledge and skills. |
|
Level 6: Exceptional |
Student displays an outstanding and creative/innovative level of the expected knowledge and skills. |
There will be an individually scheduled half-hour "Exit Interview" scheduled for each student at the end of the term. A variety of time slots will be available on the Friday after the last day of class, and during Final Exam week. Students will be asked to carry on a conversation on topics such as:
This will be a 15-point graded activity, using the following rubric:
|
and Points |
|
|
|
Level 1: Emergent Points: 0 |
Student was not present to participate in the exit Interview and was not excused. |
|
|
Level 2: Developing Points: 5 to 10 |
Student participated in the Exit Interview, and displayed modest insights into the content of the course and the discussion topics. |
|
|
Level 3: Strong Points: 11 to 15 |
Student participated in the Exit Interview and showed good to very good insight into the discussion topics and their relationships to the course and the overall goal of improving the education that his or her students will receive in the future. |