The Problem:
- What are
the conditions that explain the (rise and/or) fall of great states?
- How are
we to distinguish between causes and symptoms?
- The measurement of Rome's success in the principate was the prosperity of her cities. Document the transformation and explain the factors.
By the mid 3rd century, Rome
was clearly in a crisis. The imperial system was stressed by civil war; the
borders were increasingly permeable, the tax base of the empire was breaking
down. That is, the ability of the empire to fund the high standard of living
we have observered was now being compromised.
Two general introductions to the problems
- Revisiting the economy:
some basics
- Agriculture was pre-eminent,
but most products were consumed locally, not traded. Thoughout ancient and pre-modern history:
- Towns were where rich
landowners lived; they provided centers for administration and state religion,
modest crafts and local markets.
- They were also centers of consumption and financed by taxes and rents rather than trade or industry.
- Interregional
trade was constrained by the relative lack of specialization and by uniform conditions of farming;
no mass markets; costs associated with moving products by land.
- During Principate,
- agricultural production increased, more land was cultivated, population
expanded to level of early modern period. A greater proportion of workers
was involved in non-agricultural production and services (tho by modern
standards this was still low).
- Specialization of labor allowed for an increase in per capita production, stimulated by the collection of taxes and rents.
- The collection of
taxes for army led to money being spent at the frontier, encouraging
the development of urban centers on the Rhine and Danube, and the development
of some long distance trade especially if the products could be carried
by ship.
- Traders and craftsmen were modest in their operations,
and of low social status; any that did make fortunes [social mobility], like Trimalchio, the hero of Petronius's satire, promptly bought land,
and became 'respectable' landowners.
- Land brought status; status involved
display in the form of private and public benefactions.
- Still, a fragile core:
Agricultual increases due more to cultivation of marginal land (i.e., better
suited for pasturage than agriculture). Constrained by the lack of fertilizer, irrigation,
technology; that is the prosperity depended upon continuing peace.
- The Severans (origin
of family, Marcinus, Septimius; Julia Domna
and children; Caracalla without Geta;
Elagabalus ('surpassed all others in
good looks but that was his only recommendation'; Alma-Tadema). Severus Alexander. The following
are first apparent under the Severans, but become progressively more serious
throughout the century.
- Open military monarchy; (RC §104-5: it was impossible to give the soldiers their pay in full in addition to the donatives they were receiving...and equally impossible not to give it; and Thenceforth military power regained the ascendant, and the senate has remained until our time [360] deprived of the power to choose the emperor) Open reliance on soldiers. Mater castrorum. Pay increases from 300 to 500 to 750.
- decline of Senate; emperor not the servant of the state, but dominates it
=>hence the new name for the Principate, namely the Dominate. dominus et deus the new title: note contrast to optimus princeps.
- External pressure
building: Persia, Britain, lower Danube. The final consolidation of frontier;
soldier allowed to marry (no longer a field force); hereditary leases of
imperial property to auxiliaries (barbarians), a kind of danegeld(RC II 110)
- Extension of franchise
(RC II 106).
- Most cities still prosperous
under Severans (to AD 230), but note case of Aquileia in 238RC §111.
- Rural areas increasingly oppressed by higher
taxes, aurum coronarium, and rents (RC
II 107). Encourages brigandage (RC 109)
and centrifugal tendencies.
- Signs of the change: Silver
content of coins declines 50% (RC
II 112). Resort to compulsory services (RC
II 115-7).
- Stages in the 'Crisis'
- 235-285: Era
of soldier emperors (RC 105)
- 285-325: Reforms of
Diocletian and Constantine
- 325-395: Last attempts
at imperial unity; Hadrianople (378), division of empire
- 395-475: Visigoths
sack Rome (410), and collapse of the West (476).
- The Crisis of the 3rd
Century: the 'soldier emperors'. The problems described in III become much
more serious.
- Increasing pressure
of barbarians on the frontiers => increasing demand for soldiers (note
map of frontier). Cities no longer safe (RC II 109). Barbarization
of army.(RC
II 110).
- Minimal real growth
in economy after 100; lack of technological progress in agriculture and
manufacturing. The economy of the empire could only support a governmental
structure of a certain size. Clear in the archaeological record; cities
begin to become smaller; labor leaves the cities RC §111.
- Internal population
decline (?) due to:
- Plague in late 2nd
Cent.; other things being equal not a long term problem.
- General decline
in population (alimenta programs); failure to raise children (RC
II 87) --such programs indicate general awareness of problem.
- Rise of military monarchy:
the arcana imperii ('secret of the empire exposed'); competition
between armies and commanders. Of 26 empp. between 235-285, only one died
of natural causes.
- recruits come from
more barbarian elements with less commitment to 'idea of Rome' RC §110.
- emerging regionalism
('Gallic Empire') due to
failure of central authority to protect.
- army commanders
no longer represent intellectual and civic elite but are less well educated
and less sensitive to the values of the Augustan system; compete with
one another to buy loyalty of soldiers. How to pay for army?
- Growth of bureaucracy
without growth in economy; from 40 to 100 provinces and then dioceses above
them each with full bureaucratic structure. Ratios not clear, but Mediterranean
could support a far smaller administration than could China.
- The financial squeeze.
Higher bureaucratic costs and higher costs for defense in a situation in
which the economy could not expand to support the additions produced
- Increasingly oppressive
tax structure and lawlessness undermined urban life, the essence of imperial
society and culture. RC§107, 111
- With declining revenues,
government undermined currency by reducing gold/silver content of coinage => inflation. Complicated
by the fact that the government regularly refused to accept its coin for
taxation; reversion to barter RC§112
- Regimentation in
professions: Compulsory services and a command economy.
RC§111.
A general model
We will do a 'Classroom Exercise' at the beginning of Wednesdays class. Here is the topic: We have seen a significaof nt amount of evidence illustrating the transformation of Roman life in the mid third century.
The measurement of Rome's success in the principate was the prosperity of her cities. Document the transformation of the Empire and its cities during the 3rd Century, and explain the factors associated with that transformation.
Class Reporting Tool.