diglib Archive
Date: Mon Jun 20 11:48:29 2005
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

diglib: costs/benefits document for DCC meeting



Attached is a draft of some of the costs and benefits of
digital collections. It should form a starting point for our
discussion of what to include about this in the survey's contextual
document. The text is also included below:
******************************************************************
At this stage of digital collection development, it is difficult to quantify the costs and benefits or accurately assess the risks. The infrastructure for building, providing access to, and maintaining digital collections is too new and evolving too quickly for anyone to have developed reliable cost/benefit figures. Costs (staffing, equipment, software, storage) can be tracked for specific collections at a particular point in time but technological developments and changing expertise will continue to change the equation for some time. Risks are generally perceived to be high due to the novelty and instability of the media. Perceived benefits are easy to articulate but equally difficult to quantify.

While the costs of selection, acquisition, conversion, ingest, cataloging, presentation, documentation, and preservation of digital collections are still largely guesswork, some of the risks and costs that are commonly cited are:

* A high risk of loss from human error and/or system failure.
* The expense of keeping up with never-ending product development.
* A significant capital investment for the underlying support systems and the need for integrating the new technologies into existing information management procedures and processes.
* A high initial investment for digital conversion, both in terms if equipment and developing workflows and processes.
* The insecurity of rapidly evolving and competing standards, both in terms of potential risk if the wrong standards are selected and in terms of the time commitment for keeping informed, reviewing them, and making changes when needed.
* Ongoing costs associated with documenting local policies and practices.
* The time and expertise needed to re-train existing staff or hire new staff with appropriate skills.
* The fundamental instability of digital media and an uncertain path for preservation.

Some of the perceived benefits of digital collections are that they can:
* Provide access to and greater awareness of underutilized or less accessible materials, such as photographs and slides, historical documents, government documents, archival materials, and unpublished materials of all kinds.
* Expand access to materials of all kinds by delivering materials directly to users remotely and without restrictions based on opening hours of the storage facility.
* Broaden access to physically fragile or rare materials, so that any user with computer access can make use of digitized materials without the need for special training or authorizations. Because of the quality of the digital object, it is often not necessary for the researcher to touch the originals at all.
* Provide new delivery mechanisms for content. The power of full-text searching, the ability to search across different digital collections, and the combining of disparate physical objects into a new digital object facilitates using traditional resources in new ways.
* Expand support for instructional programs. The use of new interfaces combined with new ways to deliver content can revolutionize the ways in which research materials are used for teaching and learning.
* Enable more effective sharing of limited resources, such as when libraries can reduce print subscriptions when their users have access to electronic versions of the content.
* Preserve at-risk materials. In addition to reducing wear and tear on fragile or rare originals, digitization is often undertaken to preserve materials whose original form has deteriorated past the point of saving or using.
* Increase institutional visibility.
* Strengthen and build partnerships with other cultural heritage institutions.
* Provide opportunities to help shape the digital landscape, as we participate in the development, testing, and refinement of standards.


Attachment: Costs_benefits.doc
Description: MS-Word document


<<< text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed: Unrecognized >>>