RE: diglib: RE: lib-council: streaming media web page

["Christine L. Sundt" <csundt@darkwing.uoregon.edu>]

Sara is not alone in being out of the loop.  Same problem/issue for me - in
seeing only parts of conversations.

Chris.

Christine L. Sundt
Visual Resources Curator
University of Oregon
Architecture & Allied Arts Library
Lawrence Hall - Room 300
1190 Franklin Boulevard
Eugene, OR 97403-5239 - U.S.A.

v: 541/346-2209
f: 541/346-2205
email: csundt@uoregon.edu
Copyright & Art Issues - http://uoregon.edu/~csundt/copyweb/

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	owner-diglib@lists.uoregon.edu
[mailto:owner-diglib@lists.uoregon.edu]  On Behalf Of Sara Brownmiller
Sent:	Thursday, July 29, 2004 8:55 PM
To:	Andrew R. Bonamici
Cc:	Library Council; kirstinh@darkwing.uoregon.edu; Kellie Ann
Garsed-Donnelly; Laura L. Willey; Stacy DeHart; Andrew Kirkpatrick;
diglib@lists.uoregon.edu; Library Council; kirstinh@darkwing.uoregon.edu;
Kellie Ann Garsed-Donnelly
Subject:	Re: diglib: RE: lib-council: streaming media web page


I'm not sure how we resolve this but I feel we have too many lists going.
It is difficult to have a conversation when you only see part of the
messages.  Until Andrew responded here, I did not receive either Laura's
or JQ's response, so I'm not sure how they were sent out.  Perhaps my
email is flaky.

Sara

Sara Brownmiller			University of Oregon Libraries
Director, Library Systems 		1299 University of Oregon
Women's Studies Librarian		Eugene, OR  97403-1299
					541/346-2368 (voice)
snb@uoregon.edu				541/346-3485 (fax)

On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Andrew R. Bonamici wrote:

> All:
>
> This is very helpful; exactly the kind of discussion I was hoping for to
> help refine the site.
>
> Here are some additional tools that could prove useful not only for
> copyright/IP issues but project intake/evaluation in general (& not only
> for streaming media):
>
> http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~kirstinh/IT%20Fellowship/Requirements.html
> The requirements gathering questionnaire used by the IMG asks:
> "Are there any copyright, permission, branding, or asset issues which need
> to be considered?"
>
> http://libweb.uoregon.edu/diglib/valueset2_rev2.html
> The Digital Libraries Group "Digital Library Projects - Value Set
> Questions") also addresses  copyright/ownership at an early stage in the
> project review/intake process:
> "Copyright issues create a baseline for decision-making with respect to
> digitization. Candidates for digitization must be in the public domain or
> there must be a clear plan of action for obtaining permission to digitize.
> In situations where copyright issues present great difficulties, it may be
> appropriate to create a digital finding aid or another e-tool that will
> serve to enhance access.
>
>     1. Has the copyright status of the materials/collections to be
> digitized been determined?
>     2. Are the materials/collections in the public domain or protected
> under copyright law?
>     3. If the materials/collections are protected under copyright law,
what
> is the likelihood that the Library will be able to obtain the needed
> permission(s) for digitization?"
>
> Thanks again for the feedback.
>
> ARB
>
> At 02:12 PM 7/29/2004 -0700, Laura L. Willey wrote:
> >I think it is pretty important that we quickly mount some links on the
> >streaming video pages about copyright/intellectual property.
> >
> >Maybe a basic copyright page with links at least to:
> >
> >UO Copyright Principles in Action
> >http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~copyrght/Docs_Html/II_GHI.htm#IIH
> >
> >FERPA
> >http://libweb.uoregon.edu/acs_svc/ferpa.html
> >
> >Fair Use Guidelines for Educational Media
> >http://www.indiana.edu/~ccumc/copyright/ccguides.html#toc
> >
> >Copyright Crashcourse (Video, Audio and the Community)
> >http://www.utsystem.edu/ogc/intellectualproperty/mono3.htm
> >
> >Laura
> >
> >
> >At 01:15 PM 7/29/2004, JQ Johnson wrote:
> >>Faye raises lots of important issues.  We should get a group together to
> >>discuss them further.  I think there was some thought last year that the
> >>electronic reserves task force would tackle these issues, but Laura and
our
> >>group are leaning to the conclusion that the people needed to deal with
> >>video archive policies are different from the people needed to deal with
> >>ereserves, and so it's probably better to convene a different policy
group.
> >>
> >>I have lots of opinions on the IP issues, but I don't think we have a
> >>consensus yet.
> >>
> >>One of the big unknowns in the IP area is how people are going to apply
the
> >>TEACH Act.  My current feeling is that it will be fairly important,
though
> >>not as important as fair use.  TEACH Act has lots of very specific
> >>requirements, e.g. password protection, technological protection
mechanisms,
> >>and a different set of "amount" guidelines from those for fair use.
> >>
> >>I agree with Faye completely that the UO really needs a centralized
service
> >>that would assist users (I'm thinking mostly of faculty and other
courseware
> >>developers, but this potentially applies to research publications as
well)
> >>in obtaining copyright clearances for use of media.  Katy
> >>Kronholm'scopyright clearance office is very tightly focused on printed
> >>coursepacks.  Music does a bit of copyright clearance with BMI and
ASCAP,
> >>but doesn't offer a service to the community.  Nobody is prepared  to
clear
> >>other media.
> >>
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: owner-lib-council@lists.uoregon.edu
> >>[mailto:owner-lib-council@lists.uoregon.edu]On Behalf Of Faye Chadwell
> >>Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 1:03 PM
> >>To: Andrew R. Bonamici; lib-council@lists.uoregon.edu
> >>Cc: lwilley@darkwing.uoregon.edu
> >>Subject: Re: lib-council: streaming media web page
> >>
> >>
> >>Andrew,
> >>
> >>This is a great start but I have just a couple of questions:
> >>
> >>If I am a student who wants to offer my project to you, how do I know
you
> >>are going to safeguard my intellectual property?
> >>
> >>Is there mechanism for submission similar to what JQ and Carol developed
> >>for the institutional repository?
> >>
> >>Are y'all going to explore or explain some more of the copyright issues
for
> >>depositing projects or using various types of materials here?
> >>There are definitely some materials for which we absolutely cannot use
this
> >>technology, especially some of the videos, DVDs, recordings, photos, and
> >>slides we have purchased or received as gifts--not even if we are only
> >>showing a part of it.
> >>
> >>When we begin purchasing materials for which we have streaming or
> >>distribution rights, then how will this fit into the picture?
> >>
> >>Just a couple of conversations I have had with the Campus Copyright
office
> >>indicated to me that they are not in a position to help our faculty
users
> >>navigate the use of nonprint materials for classroom use.  Are we at a
> >>point that the Libraries ought to be pressuring the campus to support
this
> >>more?
> >>
> >>Faye
> >>
> >>
> >>At 11:17 AM 7/29/2004, Andrew R. Bonamici wrote:
> >> >http://libweb.uoregon.edu/med_svc/streaming-media/index.html
> >> >
> >> >Admin, Council & other interested parties:
> >> >
> >> >Here is a public web page for the streaming media service -- many
thanks
> >> >to Stacy, Andy, Tom & anyone else who helped get this ready! I think
this
> >> >warrants some wide promotion both within the libraries & across
campus, so
> >> >am alerting Ron also. In the meantime, check it out & see if there are
> >> >additional features/info that you think would be helpful in making
> >> >referrals and sharing information about this service with others on
campus.
> >> >
> >> >BTW we need to begin moving away from use of "Virage" as a name for
this
> >> >service -- the brand  may be evaporating due to mergers &
acquisitions.
> >> >
> >> >ARB
> >> >
>
>