CRNs: 25553/25554

Meeting times: TR 10:00-11:20 in 360 CON

Email: imcneely@uoregon.edu

Phone: 346-4791

Office hours: TR 11:30-12:30, W 12:00-1:00 in 319 MCK

Web: http://www.uoregon.edu/~imcneely



Course description

 

This is an historical survey of the major social institutions in which academic knowledge has been produced, transmitted, preserved, and categorized in the West.

 

The course will mix lectures with discussions of readings, though the two parts are kept deliberately out of sync. Lectures emphasize institutions designed to encompass all knowledge and the ideologies that undergirded them. Readings focus on times when institutions were in flux and individuals and small scholarly communities could reshape how knowledge was organized. These were times, too, when women could participate in the reorganization of knowledge despite their frequent exclusion from formal institutions.

 

Prerequisites: basic familiarity with European history, ancient, medieval, or modern; and a willingness to rethink the structure and very purpose of contemporary higher education.

 

Assignments

 

 

The various academic exercises are intended to mimic the forms of learning found in each of the institutions we’ll be studying. They also highlight the theme of gender. For example, during week two, students copy a passage, by hand, on the relation between gender and learning during the Middle Ages—just as a medieval nun might have.

 

Everyone must do either exercise 1 or 2. Further exercises, described at the end of the syllabus, are required for three of the remaining seven units of the course (nos. 3-9). A sign-up sheet will be circulated during the second class meeting asking you to choose, in advance, the three units (besides no. 1 or 2) that you’ll be writing about. These choices should be regarded as binding.

 

The exercises will function as a springboard for class discussion; you may be called upon to read sections out loud to your peers and/or perform in other appropriate ways. For this reason, exercises are due at the beginning of class on the day the readings in question are being discussed. Late exercises will not be accepted, save in cases of documented emergency. If you fail to turn in a completed exercise in class on the applicable due date—and fail to produce evidence of debilitating illness or acute family crisis—you will receive no credit for that particular assignment. You may not write an exercise for extra credit to offset a late or otherwise failing assignment or for any other reason.

 

Students enrolled in HIST 521 are required to complete significant additional work. This work consists of a series of meetings with the course instructor, additional scholarly reading at a higher level, and work with primary sources. The specific character of the supplementary work is negotiated at the beginning of the term and may vary in emphasis depending on the needs of the student.

 

 

Books for purchase

 

 

 

Working schema

 

Unit

Institution

Ideology

Era

Form

1

The library

Philosophy

Antiquity

Critical edition

2

The monastery

Christianity

500-1100

Gloss

3

The university

Scholasticism

1100-1500

Disputation

4

The republic of letters

Humanism

1500-1800

Letter

5

The academy

same

same

Impresa

6

The disciplines

Idealism

1800-1900

Syllabus

7

The laboratory

Materialism

same

Experiment

8

Big science

Scientism

1900-2000

Grant proposal

9

The two cultures

Postmodernism

same

In formation?

 

 

Class schedule, discussion topics, and weekly readings

 

CAPITALS indicate lecture days. Italics indicate exercise/discussion days.

Asterisks (*) indicate readings on the Web or on electronic reserve.

 

 

(1/10) INTRODUCTION

 

In-class reading and discussion

*McNeely, The Organization of Knowledge, intro. (PDF on website)

 

On Thursday, bring a list of your top four choices from exercises 3-9

 

 

(1/12) THE LIBRARY

(1/17) The critical edition

 

Dzielska, Hypatia of Alexandria, 66-106 then 27-65 and 111-120

 

Exercise 1: Use the Google search engine to assemble a two-page, single-spaced collection of short paragraphs shedding light on the nature of Hypatia’s bond—erotic, spiritual, intellectual, and purely friendly (“Platonic”?)—with her male students. The paragraphs should be copied from the most authentic ancient sources you can find online; keep in mind that information on the Internet is, however, notoriously inaccurate. Append a one- to two-page description (1) describing your research methods and (2) defending the authenticity and accuracy of your edition. Consult Dzielska for ideas on sources.

 

 

(1/19) THE MONASTERY

(1/24) The gloss

 

Peter Abelard, “Historia calamitatum” (pp. 57-106) and “Letter 5. Heloise to Abelard” (pp. 159-79) in The Letters of Abelard and Heloise

 

Exercise 2: Read the story of Abelard’s calamities. Copy at least a page’s worth, by hand, word for word, as neatly as possible, from Heloise’s letter to Abelard and then gloss it: that is, add a running commentary, either in the margins or between the lines, on the significance of gender to the pursuit of learning during the Middle Ages. Neatness and readability count.

 

 

(1/26) THE UNIVERSITY

(1/31) The disputation

 

*Prudence Allen, The Concept of Woman, vol. 2, 68-74

*Margaret Porette, The Mirror of Simple Souls, verse prologue, prologue (=ch. 1), ch. 2

*Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica: familiarize yourself with its contents and structure (prima pars through tertia pars) and read carefully the discussion of “Whether, besides philosophy, any further doctrine is required?”

 

Exercise 3: Consider the question “Can love provide knowledge of God that reason cannot?” Compose an answer Aquinas might have given to this question, adopting the form he would have given it. Come to class prepared to defend both the pro and contra stances in verbal confrontation.

 

 

(2/2) THE REPUBLIC OF LETTERS

(2/7) The letter

 

Schiebinger, The Mind Has No Sex?, 1-118, 245-264

 

Exercise 4: Compose a letter Maria Winkelmann might have written to a male colleague to help her gain admission to the Berlin Academy of Sciences. Pay attention both to her substantive credentials and accomplishments and to the obstacles raised by her gender and class background.

 

 

(2/9) THE ACADEMY

(2/14) The impresa

 

Schiebinger, The Mind Has No Sex?, 119-88, 265-78

 

Exercise 5: Use images and symbols of masculinity and femininity to design an impresa (emblem with a motto, in a language of your choice) for an academy dedicated to the study, appreciation, cultivation, worship, domination, or desecration—you decide—of nature. Explain the thinking behind your choices, and in particular what kinds of people and what kinds of science/art/scholarship your academy means to attract. Consult Roberto Paolo Ciardi’s article on e-reserve, “A Knot of Words and Things,” on the design of imprese.

 

 

(2/16) THE DISCIPLINES

(2/21) Midterm

 

Humboldt, Personal Narrative, xxxv-lxiv, 5-125

 

The midterm will require you to design a knowledge tree (hierarchy of disciplines) using Humboldt’s multifarious interests as a guide.

 

 

(2/23) The syllabus

 

Humboldt, Personal Narrative (finish with exercise 6 in mind)

 

Exercise 6: Read Bonnie Smith’s “The Practices of Scientific History” on e-reserve. Imagine that you’re one of Humboldt’s male companions and want to make a name in one of the fields you’ve already identified as a subset of his encyclopedic project on the midterm exam. Design a full-fledged syllabus that will appeal to other young men and give them a structured program of university-based study.

 

 

(2/28) THE LABORATORY

(3/2) The experiment

 

Wiener, On the Human Use of Human Beings, 7-111

*Ken Newquist review of William Gibson’s Neuromancer (1984)

 

Exercise 7: It has been estimated that one-third of the messages sent over the Internet contain pornographic images or text. How would Wiener explain the popularity of “cybersex”? (See ch. V on the notion that organisms might be understood as messages.) Formulate a question comparing some aspect of cybersex with conventional human sex and devise an experiment to answer it.

 

 

(3/7) BIG SCIENCE

(3/9) Grant proposal

 

Epstein, Impure Science, 1-19, 26-38, 45-104, 181-89, 216-64, 330-53

 

Exercise 8: Write the introduction to a grant proposal proposing joint scientific and civic participation in studying a current issue related to men’s, women’s, or sexual health and requiring financial support from the government agency of your choice.

 

 

(3/14) THE TWO CULTURES

(3/16) Speculations about the future

 

Wiener, On the Human Use of Human Beings, 112-93

 

Exercise 9: Write an op-ed piece (nonacademic newspaper commentary for the general public) outlining the form of a new institution of knowledge to bridge the sciences and the humanities.

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                

[Last modified 9/22/06]