IFS MEETING APRIL 8-9, 2004 UNIVERSITY OF OREGON

Members Present: Scott Burns, Mina Carson, James Earl, Dan Edge, Peter Gilkey, Marye Hefty, Solveig Holmquist, Jim Isenberg, Laura Jones, Kelvin Koong, Robert Mercer, Marny Rivera, Maureen Sevigny, Jim Tooke, Nathan Tublitz, Bob S. Turner, Sarah Witte, Craig Wollner.

Friday 8 April 2004

GENERAL GREETINGS AND DISTRIBUTION BY PRESIDENT GILKEY OF OFFICIAL IFS TEE-SHIRTS.

LORRAINE DAVIS (Academic Vice President UO) Gave welcoming remarks and notes about the new Business building in which our meeting was held, which is remarkably environmentally friendly.

JIM ARNOLD (OUS) AND GLENDA TEPPER (Clakamas CC)


DENISE YUNKER (OUS Benefits)

PHIL BARNHART (Oregon State Representative)


DIANE VINES (past OUS administrator - presently works in GOVERNOR'S OFFICE, HEALTH INITIATIVE)

CAMPUS REPORTS

Saturday, April 10, 2004

DAVE MCDONALD (OUS, MORE/BETTER/FASTER TASK GROUP) CRAIG WOLLNER, BOB TURNER, ON THE BRIEFING BOOK MINUTES FROM LAST MEETING APPROVED.

MORE ON ORP:

BOARD MEETINGS J
  • June Board meeting is Thursday 3rd at SOU, possibly beginning late morning. All IFS members are encouraged to attend.
  • All IFS members are strongly encouraged to be visible at as many working Board meetings and ORP meetings as possible. Peter will send dates of the various working groups. Attendees are encouraged to write a brief report for sharing with the rest of the IFS.
  • Concerns about the current Board:
  • 1. Amount of influence exerted by one Board member (Goldschmidt).
  • 2. Action is necessary in addition to discussion.
  • 3. Curriculum may be dictated by community colleges and administrators.
  • 4. Legislature is unconcerned about quality.
  • 5. Faculty on the campuses are relatively unaware of the implications of the current Board.
  • 6. How to reach Board members? Informally--after meetings, dinners, IFS meetings.
  • 7. Potential compromise of education in the interests of more, better, faster.
  • 8. Belief that the Board will listen to faculty only if we sell ourselves as the practical experts rather than as academicians.
  • 9. Board is working with a speed that precludes due deliberation.
  • 10. Keep doing our jobs in the classroom and our offices--tell the truth and help students think.
  • 11. More, better, faster will result in less, worse, and slower.
  • 12. Economy is crashing; resources for higher education are not forthcoming; will result in Board micro-managing our classes. Will budget process be driven with due concern for the education process?
  • 13. Faculty are not being invited to give input; how can we protect the quality of education?
  • 14. Goldschmidt was placed in position by Governor to "stop disinvestments"--yet the model of higher education is being realigned to a corporate model.
  • 15. The ship is sinking; what will we put into the lifeboat for saving? Fear that distance learning will be put into the lifeboat, which can increase individual salaries but is not perceived by either faculty or students as quality education.
  • 16. We must talk about quality, access, and delivery, because no one else will. It is faculty that must be defining quality and delivery.
  • 17. The briefing book will be an important tool for influencing legislators, as will faculty attendance at Board meetings--yet there's no time to participate due to workload.
  • 18. There may be a need for a statewide union.
  • HOW CAN THE IFS BECOME MORE EFFECTIVE? Saturday May 8th:


    Motions:

    NEXT MEETING Next IFS meeting: Thursday 3rd, Friday 4th, and Saturday 5th at SOU. Since the meeting site was changed from OIT due to the opportunity to meet the Board in Ashland, OIT has been rescheduled June 2005.

    Laura Jones. Secretary of the IFS


    Web page spun on 15 April 2004 by Peter B Gilkey 202 Deady Hall, Department of Mathematics at the University of Oregon, Eugene OR 97403-1222, U.S.A. Phone 1-541-346-4717 Email:peter.gilkey.cc.67@aya.yale.edu of Deady Spider Enterprises