IFS President Gilkey has received 2 emails and an attached document from Prof. Kari Rothi.
Tue, 9 Nov 2004 17:35:04 -0800 (PST)
Subject: RE: Comments in regard to the Transfer Modules
From: "Kari Rothi" (rothik@mhcc.edu)
To: "Shannon Valdivia" (valdivis@mhcc.edu), (gilkey@darkwing.uoregon.edu)

Sorry I could not attend today's session. What exactly is the AAOT, if not a gauranteed "transfer module" of gen ed credits? I believe that is its very definition...

Here's a quote from the class catalog: "The Oregon Transfer Degree (Associate of Arts) is a program of study that community college students can follow to fulfill all their lower division general education requirements for a bachelor's degree at an Oregon University System institution."

Why re-invent the wheel? The main difference seems to be that the AAOT requires 90 credits hours while the proposed transfer modules requires 45. If the OUS has already agreed to the courses listed for the AAOT, then they should have no problem with subdividing this same list to create a "freshman" core and a "sophomore" core, thereby providing 45 credit hour modules. That seems very do-able. But whatever is done should be followed up by Shannon's point on advising. For students to really understand ANYTHING about seamless transfer, they need access to advisers, a shrinking population. Community colleges pick up a lot of first generation college students who often do not have family members that can help them work the system. They may believe that all colleges are alike, teach the same subjects and have the same expectations. They may have no idea, for instance, that you can't earn an electrical engineering degree at the University of Oregon or that the University of Oregon has state of the art electron microscopes not available at Oregon State. They may have no one to help them make a reasonable transfer plan. (I hear echoes of HD100 here) If we don't have advisers available and a plan in place to GET them to those advisers, no amount of module planning in the world will make any difference in their success rates.

Kari Rothi


Thought I'd spend a few moments to see if I could suggest a division of the 90 credits that made sense (to me) and that would meet the requirements of the AAOT if both "modules" were completed. Still allows the student the flexibility to explore his or her interests. Not sure how it would impact the various pro-tech programs. Not sure how it would be received at the OUS level. Just intended to stimulate discussion. Kari See A proposal for a Transfer Module
Web page spun on 9 November 2004 by Peter B Gilkey 202 Deady Hall, Department of Mathematics at the University of Oregon, Eugene OR 97403-1222, U.S.A. Phone 1-541-346-4717 Email:peter.gilkey.cc.67@aya.yale.edu of Deady Spider Enterprises