OSRL LOGO

UNIVERSITY OF OREGON INSTRUCTIONAL FACULTY SURVEY - METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS
February 2000

by Stephen M. Johnson, Associate Director, and Patricia A. Gwartney, Director, with the assistance of Kimberlee Langolf

OREGON SURVEY RESEARCH LABORATORY
5245 UNIVERSITY OF OREGON
EUGENE, OR 97403-5245
TELEPHONE: 541-346-0824
FACSIMILE: 541-346-5026
Contact OSRL via Email

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction
II. Survey Methodology
III. Survey Results
IV. Conclusions

FIGURES PRESENTED
1. Overall UO Job Satisfaction
2. UO Job Satisfaction by School/College
3. UO Job Satisfaction by Academic Rank
4. UO Job Satisfaction by Tenure Status
5. UO Job Satisfaction by Sex

6. Importance of Seven Faculty Compensation Principles
7. Principles "Very Important" by School/College
8. Principles "Very Important" by Tenure Status
9. Principles "Very Important" by Academic Rank
10. Principles "Very Important" by Sex

11. Importance of Five Compensation Criteria
12. Criteria "Very Important" by School/College
13. Criteria "Very Important" by Tenure Status
14. Criteria "Very Important" by Academic Rank
15. Criteria "Very Important" by Sex

16. First, Second, and Third "Most Important" Compensation Criteria
17. "Most Important" Criteria by School/College
18. "Most Important" Criteria by Tenure Status
19. "Most Important" Criteria by Academic Rank
20. "Most Important" Criteria by Sex

21. Importance of Seven Faculty Compensation Principles: Telephone & Mail Comparison
22. Importance of Seven Faculty Compensation Criteria: Telephone & Mail Comparison
23. First, Second, and Third Most Important Faculty Compensation Criteria: Telephone and Mail Survey Comparison

INTRODUCTION- UO Instructional Faculty Survey