|
WRITING BOOK REVIEWS
Useful book reviews do at least two things. They offer readers a basic
orientation to the book under discussion and an original way to think
about that book and what it does. Even very short reviews can be interesting
as well as concise. You can achieve these goals by keeping the following
guidelines in mind.
-
Sketch briefly the historical territory covered by the book(s). Lots
of people read book reviews instead of reading books, or to figure
out whether or not they wish to read the book. Tell readers what the
book is about.
-
Identify for your reader the key question or questions the author
asks (and by implication, what questions are not addressed).
-
Assess the author's success or failure in covering the topic and
answering the questions. (Don't forget to offer concrete evidence
to support your view, whatever it is.)
-
Explain why the book matters (or doesn't). In other words, make an
original contribution to answering the question: So what?
One of the best strategies for writing good reviews is reading a lot of good reviews. In
preparing your review, consider how professional historians approach the same assignment.
Check out:
-
Recent issues of the Journal of American History or the
American Historical Review. These are general academic history
journals oriented toward audiences in many different fields. Each
issue contains a large number of short books reviews, on the order
of 500-1000 words, or approximately 2-4 double-spaced pages.
-
Reviews in American History. This is a journal devoted entirely
to longish book reviews and review essays, which consider more than
one title. You can find it on the shelf in Knight Library and also
on the Internet through Project MUSE: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/reviews_in_american_history/
-
Reviews about books in a particular area of interest to you. One
easy way to locate these is by using the database called "America:
History and Life." You can access it through the UO Library website. Look Under "Articles, Databases,
and Indexes."
-
Reviews by historians and/or about historical titles in major review
outlets, including the New York Times Book Review, the New
York Review of Books, and the Times Literary Supplement.
Like reviews in publications geared to professional historians, these
reviews are written for an intelligent reading audience. They are,
however, less likely than those reviews to address historiographical
(i.e. interpretive) themes directly.
-
Internet history reviews are not constrained by the space limitations
of conventional publications, and therefore vary in length from quite
short to interminable. Check out:
-
H-NET Reviews: http://www.h-net.msu.edu/reviews
|