Publications of Scott DeLancey
Arranged by topic
There's also a chronological
listing at this site.
Back to DeLancey's
Linguistics Home Page
- 1981. An interpretation of split ergativity and related
patterns. Language 57.3:626-57.
- 1987. Transitivity in grammar and cognition. R. Tomlin, ed.,
Discourse Relations and Cognitive Units, pp. 53-68.
Benjamins.
- 1991. Event construal and case role
assignment. Proceedings
of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics
Society.
- 1994. Grammaticalization and linguistic
theory. Proceedings
of the 1993 Mid-America Linguistics Conference and Conference on
Siouan/Caddoan Languages, pp. 1-22. Boulder: Dept. of
Linguistics, University of Colorado.
- 1995ms. Verbal case frames
in English and Tibetan.
- 1997. What an innatist argument should
look like. in T. Haukioja, M-L
Helasvuo, and M. Miestamo, eds., SKY 1997 (1997 Yearbook of the
Linguistic Association of Finland), pp. 7-24.
- 1997. Grammaticalization and the gradience of categories: Relator
nouns and postpositions in Tibetan and Burmese. pp. 51-69 in J. Bybee, J.
Haiman, and S. A. Thompson, eds., Essays on Language Function and
Language Type. Benjamins, 1997.
- 1981. An interpretation of split ergativity and related
patterns. Language 57.3:626-57.
- 1982. Aspect, transitivity, and viewpoint. P. Hopper, ed.,
Tense-Aspect: Between Semantics and Pragmatics.
pp. 167-83. Benjamins.
- 1982. Modern Tibetan: A case study in ergative typology.
J. of Linguistic Research 2.1:21-31.
- 1982. Agentivity and causation: Data from Newari.
Proceeding of the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley
Linguistics Society, pp. 54-63.
- 1984. Notes on agentivity and causation. Studies in
Language 8.2:181-213.
- 1984. Transitivity and ergative case in Lhasa Tibetan.
Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley
Linguistics Society, 131-40.
- 1984. Categories of non-volitional actor in Lhasa Tibetan.
A. Zide et. al., eds., Proc. of the Conference on Participant
Roles: South Asia and Adjacent Areas, pp. 58-70. IULC.
- 1984. Agentivity in syntax. Chicago Linguistic Society
Parasession on Agentivity and Causation.
- 1985. On active typology and the nature of agentivity.
F. Plank, ed., Relational Typology. Mouton.
- 1985. Lhasa Tibetan evidentials and the semantics of causa-
tion. Proc. of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley
Linguistics Society, 65-72.
- 1986. Invited comment on Wierzbicka, 'Semantics of the
"internal dative" in English. Quaderni di Semantica VII,
no. 1:140-2.
- 1987. Transitivity in grammar and cognition. R. Tomlin, ed.,
Discourse Relations and Cognitive Units, pp. 53-68.
Benjamins.
- 1990. Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in
Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics 1.3:289-321.
- 1990. Cross-linguistic evidence for the structure of the Agent
prototype. Proc. of the 29th Child Language Research Forum.
- 1991. Event construal and case role
assignment. Proceedings
of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics
Society.
- 1995ms. Verbal case
frames in English and Tibetan.
- 1995ms. Argument structure and verb
lexicalization patterns in
English, Tibetan, and Klamath. Dept. of Linguistics, Rice
University, Nov. 1995.
- 1996. rev. of R.M.W. Dixon, Ergativity. Journal of
Linguistics 32:173-177.
- 1996. Argument structure of
Klamath bipartite stems. SSILA Conference, San Diego, Jan. 7, 1996.
- 1997. What an innatist argument should
look like. in T. Haukioja, M-L
Helasvuo, and M. Miestamo, eds., SKY 1997 (1997 Yearbook of the
Linguistic Association of Finland), pp. 7-24.
- to appear. The universal basis of case. Logos and Language.
(see also Comparative
T-B verb morphology, Miscellaneous Sino-Tibetan)
- 1985. The analysis-synthesis-lexis cycle in Tibeto-Burman: A
case study in motivated change. J. Haiman, ed., Iconicity in
Syntax, pp. 367-89. Benjamins.
- 1991. Chronological strata of suffix classes in the Klamath
verb. International Journal of American Linguistics 57:426-
445.
- 1991. The origins of verb serialization in Modern Tibetan.
Studies in Language 15:1.1-23.
- 1994. Grammaticalization and linguistic
theory. Proceedings
of the 1993 Mid-America Linguistics Conference and Conference on
Siouan/Caddoan Languages, pp. 1-22. Boulder: Dept. of
Linguistics, University of Colorado.
- 1997. Grammaticalization and the gradience of categories: Relator
nouns and postpositions in Tibetan and Burmese. pp. 51-69 in J. Bybee, J.
Haiman, and S. A. Thompson, eds., Essays on Language Function and
Language Type. Benjamins, 1997.
- 1999. Lexical prefixes and the bipartite stem construction in
Klamath. International Journal of American Linguistics 65.1.56-83.
- to appear. Grammaticalization. in G. Booij, C. Lehmann, J.
Mugdan, eds., Morphology: A Handbook on Inflection and Word
Formation. New York: De Gruyter.
- 1981. An interpretation of split ergativity and related
patterns. Language 57.3:626-57.
- 1987. Transitivity in grammar and cognition. R. Tomlin, ed.,
Discourse Relations and Cognitive Units, pp. 53-68.
Benjamins.
(see also Transitivity, actance/argument structure, and case
theory)
- 1981. An interpretation of split ergativity and related
patterns. Language 57.3:626-57.
- 1982. Modern Tibetan: A case study in ergative typology.
J. of Linguistic Research 2.1:21-31.
- 1985. On active typology and the nature of agentivity.
F. Plank, ed., Relational Typology. Mouton.
- 1996. rev. of R.M.W. Dixon, Ergativity. Journal of
Linguistics 32:173-177.
- 1981. Parameters of empathy. J. of Linguistic Research
1.3:40-49.
- 1981. The category of direction in Tibeto-Burman.
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 6.1:83-102.
- 1985. Lhasa Tibetan evidentials and the semantics of causation.
Proc. of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley
Linguistics Society, 65-72.
- 1986. Evidentiality and volitionality in Tibetan. W. Chafe and
J. Nichols, eds., Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of
Epistemology, pp. 203-13. Ablex.
- 1990. Notes on evidentiality in Hare. International
Journal of American Linguistics 56.152-8.
- 1992. The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in
Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 25:39-62.
- 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information.
Linguistic Typology 1.1:33-52.
- 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of
Pragmatics 33.3:369-382.
- 1982. Modern Tibetan: A case study in ergative typology.
J. of Linguistic Research 2.1:21-31.
- 1984. Transitivity and ergative case in Lhasa Tibetan.
Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley
Linguistics Society, 131-40.
- 1984. Categories of non-volitional actor in Lhasa Tibetan.
A. Zide et. al., eds., Proc. of the Conference on Participant
Roles: South Asia and Adjacent Areas, pp. 58-70. IULC.
- 1984. Agentivity in syntax. Chicago Linguistic Society
Parasession on Agentivity and Causation.
- 1985. On active typology and the nature of agentivity.
F. Plank, ed., Relational Typology. Mouton.
- 1985. Lhasa Tibetan evidentials and the semantics of causa-
tion. Proc. of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley
Linguistics Society, 65-72.
- 1986. Evidentiality and volitionality in Tibetan. W. Chafe and
J. Nichols, eds., Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of
Epistemology, pp. 203-13. Ablex.
- 1986ms. Relativization as
nominalization in Tibetan and Newari. 19th ICSTLL.
- 1990. Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in
Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics 1.3:289-321.
- 1990. Tibetan evidence for Nungish metathesis. Linguistics
of the Tibeto-Burman Area.
- 1990. Contour tones from lost syllables in Central Tibetan.
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area.
- 1991. The origins of verb serialization in Modern Tibetan.
Studies in Language 15:1.1-23.
- 1998. Semantic categorization in Tibetan honorific nouns.
Anthropological Linguistics 40:109-23.
- 1999. Relativization in Tibetan. in Yogendra Yadava and Warren
Glover, eds., Studies in Nepalese Linguistics,
pp. 231-49. Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy.
- to appear. Lhasa Tibetan. In G. Thurgood and R. LaPolla, The
Sino-Tibetan Languages. London: Curzon.
- to appear. Classical Tibetan. In G. Thurgood and R. LaPolla, The
Sino-Tibetan Languages. London: Curzon.
- 1981. Parameters of empathy. J. of Linguistic Research
1.3:40-49.
- 1981. The category of direction in Tibeto-Burman.
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 6.1:83-102.
- 1982. Tangut and Tibeto-Burman morphology. Linguistics of
the Tibeto-Burman Area 7.2:100-8.
- 1985. The analysis-synthesis-lexis cycle in Tibeto-Burman: A
case study in motivated change. J. Haiman, ed., Iconicity in
Syntax, pp. 367-89. Benjamins.
- 1988. On the evolution of the Kham agreement paradigm.
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 11.2:51-61.
- 1988ms. On the origins of the Kuki-Chin agreement prefixes.
21st ICSTLL, Lund.
- 1989. Verb agreement in Proto-Tibeto-Burman. Bulletin of the
School of Oriental and African Studies 52:315-33. (Chinese tr.
appeared as "Yuanshi Zang-Mianyu dungcide rencheng fanchou",
Minzu Yicong 1993.2:34-45, 1993.3:38-42).
- 1978ms. Mood particles in Sino-Tibetan. 11th Int. Conf. on
Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics.
- 1978. (with Lon Diehl and LaRaw Maran). A localistic account
of aspect in Jinghpaw. and The Tibeto-Burman tense-aspect
mechanisms. University of Michigan Papers in Linguistics
2.4:49-88.
- 1981. Parameters of empathy. J. of Linguistic Research
1.3:40-49. (Jinghpaw)
- 1982. Tangut and Tibeto-Burman morphology. Linguistics of
the Tibeto-Burman Area 7.2:100-8.
- 1982. Agentivity and causation: Data from Newari.
Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley
Linguistics Society, pp. 54-63.
- 1984. Notes on agentivity and causation. Studies in
Language 8.2:181-213. (Newari)
- 1984. Etymological notes on Tibeto-Burman case particles.
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 8.l.59-77.
- 1986ms. Relativization as
nominalization in Tibetan and Newari. 19th ICSTLL.
- 1988. On the evolution of the Kham agreement paradigm.
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 11.2:51-61.
- 1988ms. On the origins of the Kuki-Chin agreement prefixes.
21st ICSTLL, Lund.
- 1989. rev. of B. Michailovksy, La langue hayu.
Language 65:828-32.
- 1992. Sunwar copulas. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman
Area 15:1.31-38.
- 1992. The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in
Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 25:39-62.
- Grammaticalization and the gradience of categories:
Relator nouns and postpositions in Tibetan and Burmese. pp. 51-69 in J.
Bybee, J. Haiman, and S. A. Thompson, eds., Essays on Language Function
and Language Type. Benjamins, 1997.
- 1986. Notes on the history of Tai classifier systems. C. Craig,
ed., Noun Classes and Categorization, pp. 437-52. Benjamins.
- 1987. The Sino-Tibetan languages. B. Comrie, ed., The
World's Major Languages, pp. 797-810. Croom Helm.
- 1992. The Sino-Tibetan languages. W. Bright, ed.,
International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, vol 3, pp. 445-7.
NY: Oxford University Press.
- Morphological parallels between Klamath
and Wintu. J. Redden,
ed., Proc. of the 1987 Hokan-Penutian Conference, pp. 50-
60. Carbondale, IL: Dept. of Linguistics, Southern Illinois
University.
- 1987. Klamath and Wintu pronouns. International Journal of
American Linguistics 53.461-4.
- 1988. Klamath stem
structure in genetic and areal perspective.
S. DeLancey, ed., Papers from the 1988 Hokan-Penutian Workshop, pp.
31-9.
- Diachronic notes on the Klamath verb
suffixes.
S. DeLancey, ed., Papers from the 1989 Hokan-Penutian Workshop, pp.
18-27.
- 1992. Klamath and Sahaptian numerals. International
Journal of American Linguistics 58:235-39.
- 1991. Chronological strata of suffix classes in the Klamath
verb. International Journal of American Linguistics 57:426-
445.
- 1996. Argument structure of
Klamath bipartite stems. SSILA Conference, San Diego, Jan. 7, 1996.
- 1999. Lexical prefixes and the bipartite stem construction in
Klamath. International Journal of American Linguistics 65.1.56-83.
- 1987. Morphological parallels between Klamath and Wintu. J.
Redden, ed., Proc. of the 1987 Hokan-Penutian Conference,
pp. 50-60. Carbondale, IL: Dept. of Linguistics, Southern Illinois
University.
- 1987. Klamath and Wintu pronouns. International Journal of
American Linguistics 53.461-4.
- 1988. (with C. Genetti and N. Rude). Some Sahaptian-Klamath-
Tsimshianic lexical sets. William Shipley, eds, In Honor of
Mary Haas: From the Haas Festival Conference on Native American
Linguistics, pp. 195-224.
- 1992. Klamath and Sahaptian numerals. International
Journal of American Linguistics 58:235-39.
- 1994. Some Klamath-Maiduan comparative data. Hokan-Penutian
Workshop, Eugene, July 9, 1994.
- 1996. Penutian in the bipartite
stem belt: Disentangling areal and genetic correspondences.
Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley
Linguistics Society: Special Session on Historical Topics in Native
American Languages.
- 1997. (with Victor Golla) The Penutian hypothesis: Retrospect
and prospect. IJAL 63:171-202.
- 1988. Klamath stem structure in genetic and areal perspective.
S. DeLancey, ed., Papers from the 1988 Hokan-Penutian
Workshop, pp. 31-9.
- 1996. Penutian in the bipartite stem belt: Disentangling areal
and genetic correspondences. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second
Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special
Session on Historical Topics in Native American Languages.
- 1984. Notes on agentivity and causation. Studies in
Language 8.2:181-213.
- 1990. Notes on evidentiality in Hare. International
Journal of American Linguistics 56.152-8.
- (to appear) On grammatical comparative evidence and its
interpretation. in Allan Taylor, ed., Language and Prehistory
in the Americas. Stanford University Press.
Scott DeLancey, delancey@darkwing.uoregon.edu