BRETT ASHLEY KAPLAN
The photograph is violent: not because it shows violent things, but because on
each occasion it fills the sight by force.
IN NOVEMBER, 1938, the British magazine Homes &
Gardens featured an article detailing the delights of Hitler’s holiday
chalet on the Obersalzberg, just above the Bavarian town of Berchtesgaden. “The
site commands the fairest view in all Europe,” gushed the starry-eyed author and
photographer Ignatius Phayre, who noted, “The curtains are of printed linen, or
fine damask in the softer shades. The Führer is his own decorator, designer and
furnisher, as well as architect.” The article goes on to describe the
“delightful” and “lovely” daily routine maintained by Hitler on the Obersalzberg.
Given the many accounts in the local and international press of Nazi violence
during the first five years of the Hitler dictatorship, no one could
legitimately have claimed, as the peaceful images of the Berghof suggest, that
the Nazi regime would become a pacific force in Europe. That Homes &
Gardens made the choice to fawn over Hitler and his chalet so conspicuously
thus inevitably seems incredible, immoral, and ridiculous. In fact, the kinds of
photographs that accompany the article were an important part of the Nazi
propaganda machine, because the idealization of the Obersalzberg became a
linchpin in the Nazi plan to rationalize the war—that if we only struggled
through we would finally all bask in the best of German folk culture. Thus,
“Frauen Goebbels and Göring,” Phayre tells us, “in dainty Bavarian dress,
arrange dances and folk songs.” The Homes & Gardens essay paints the
Obersalzberg as a folksy mountain trading on Bavarian nostalgia and Nazi kitsch,
a portrait that both willfully ignores the violence that had always been an
inherent part of the Nazi regime and allows the regime to oppose the “danger” of
the cosmopolitan (and Jewish) city with the supposed “simplicity” of mountain
folk life. The Obersalzberg is a site of beauty that lies at the heart of the
Hitler cult.
—Roland Barthes
In March, 1941—in the middle of the war and after evidence of genocide had been
circulated—C. Brooks Peters wrote an uncannily similar article for The New
York Times. Like Phayre, Peters praises the landscape of the Obersalzberg
and notices the care taken with the décor of the Berghof; like Phayre, Peters
makes no mention of Nazi violence. The idealized image of the Obersalzberg
represented in these British and American articles from the popular press, along
with the evocation of quaint Bavarian folk dress for the wives of high-ranking
Nazi officers who commissioned unprecedented acts of violence, encapsulates
perfectly the aestheticizing mechanism of the Nazi enterprise. The elegance of
the Nazi holiday complex in the Alps offered a powerful counter-image to Nazi
genocide and other Nazi atrocities. But the Obersalzberg was not merely a
holiday retreat; it was also the place from which military and other key
decisions were made. To cite only two examples (among many), a meeting at the
Berghof with Chamberlain paved the way for the Munich agreement that in turn led
to World War II, and a gathering of the leaders of the armed forces on 22 August
1939 produced plans for the invasion of Poland. Thus, while the Holocaust was
not planned on the Obersalzberg, key military decisions were hatched in the
beautiful landscape of the Bavarian Alps. I argue that the diverse depictions of
the Obersalzberg in the popular press, literature, and souvenir albums represent
an aspect of what Walter Benjamin has termed the Nazi “aesthetization of
politics,” one that, unlike the spectacular nature of Nazi party rallies defined
so well by Leni Riefenstahl’s Triumph of the Will, attempts to mask—and
therefore ultimately justify—the violence of the Nazi regime.
In what follows I first introduce the Obersalzberg complex and then discuss how
an early twenty-first century German novel, Sybille Knauss’s Eva’s Cousin,
explores complicity and gender in the context of the elegant world of the Nazi
elite on the Obersalzberg. I then analyze souvenir photograph albums of the
Obersalzberg that were most likely purchased by G.I.s at the end of the war and
brought back to America to linger in musty closets until being donated to
libraries —albums whose photographs could have been used as illustrations for
Knauss’s novel. By way of conclusion I discuss an arresting image of the
photographer Lee Miller in Hitler’s bathtub. Ultimately, I hope that we can
learn from the uses of the Obersalzberg cautionary lessons about the mechanisms
of power, projection, and propaganda.
The Obersalzberg, 1923-2006
The Obersalzberg once hosted a tiny village above the Bavarian town of
Berchtesgaden, Germany, about fifteen miles from Salzburg, Austria. Hitler began
frequenting the area in 1923 and in 1933 bought a house there, which, after
renovations, became his holiday villa, the Berghof, in 1936-37. Architect and
Armaments Minister Albert Speer, Reichsmarschall and Luftwaffe head Hermann
Göring, Hitler’s powerful secretary Martin Bormann, and other high-ranking Nazis
also built or renovated holiday homes near the Berghof. By the height of the war
the Nazi complex on the mountain could house in various barracks, hotels, and
other accommodations 10,000 people, including Hitler Youth, 3,500 construction
workers, and many visitors. Especially during the early years of the Third
Reich, Hitler spent a great deal of time (sometimes as much as six months a
year) at the Berghof; consequently, the villa became a popular pilgrimage spot
for the thousands of avid Nazi supporters who flocked there in the hope of
catching sight of or possibly even touching the Führer. Many propaganda images
that were widely circulated during the Third Reich were taken on the
Obersalzberg. In 1937, due to Bormann’s fears for Hitler’s safety, the
area was secured by a huge security fence and was then dubbed the Führergebiet;
these security measures circumscribed but did not deter the eager pilgrims. In
1937-38 Bormann built the “Eagle’s Nest” mountain teahouse, which still stands
as a tourist attraction today. Hitler entertained (and often intimidated) many
important global dignitaries and statesmen on the Obersalzberg, including
British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, Hungarian leader Admiral Nicholas
Horthy, the Duke and Duchess of Windsor, the French Ambassador André François-Poncet,
and Italian dictator Mussolini. In 1943 Hitler ordered the construction of a
vast and exceedingly well-stocked bunker system blasted into the mountain below
the Nazi complex. On 25 April 1945 the Allies bombed the Berghof and other sites
on the Obersalzberg, and shortly after (on May 4) SS troops filled the Berghof
with petrol and ignited it. (See Lee Miller’s stunning photograph of a G.I.
watching the Berghof burn.) On 30 April 1952, the seven-year anniversary of
Hitler’s suicide, the Bavarian government razed the remaining Nazi buildings in
the complex (with the exception of the Eagle’s Nest and the Hotel zum Türken),
because the Berghof ruins had become an active neo-Nazi pilgrimage site. From
shortly after the end of the war until 1996 the U.S. army also maintained an
army recreation center at the formerly ritzy Hotel Platterhof, now called the
Hotel General Walker. In 1996, the recreation center was returned to the
Bavarian government, which leveled the Hotel General Walker in 1999-2000 and
then opened a Documentation Center. In March, 2005, on the spot where Göring’s
lavish house once stood, and a two-minute walk from the site of the Berghof, a
five-star Hotel InterContinental opened to some short-lived controversy.
The Obersalzberg is almost always characterized, in the words of an American
soldier in Band of Brothers (a film which details the 101st airborne
division’s victorious arrival at the Eagle’s Nest), as the “Nazi’s spiritual
home.” This characterization stems from several factors: first, Hitler’s
attraction to the area was heightened by the proximity of the Untersberg, a
mountain which, as the brothers Grimm document, is legendary for its association
with mighty but sleeping kings whose awakening will herald an Armageddon that
will in turn usher in a new Golden Era. Hitler, who was intensely attracted to
German legends, saw himself as such a king and made sure that the famous
panoramic window of the Berghof faced the Untersberg. Second, because the area
was fenced off after 1937 and was thus only accessible to important Nazis and
their guests, the Nazi complex itself took on a mysterious, mythical quality;
the contemporary press was full of comments about the mysteries of the Führer’s
activities on the mountain, and the Allies believed that Hitler was building a
vast “Alpine Fortress” at which he intended to make his last stand. Third, the
Obersalzberg was the place where, from 1936 onwards, Eva Braun, Hitler’s
supposedly secret mistress, primarily lived; the rumors circulating around Braun
contributed to the mythical quality of the mountain and are extensively explored
in Knauss’s novel.