Previous research show that firms tend to grow and expand after they switch to a Big Eight auditor. However,
there is little research on the other types of auditor switches, i.e., the switches from a Big Eight to a non-Big
Eight, or changes to the auditors of similar size. This paper examines the effects of changes and of magnitudes
in risk on the decision to switch auditors for the other three types of auditor switches. In order to examine risk
characteristics surrounding auditor switches, this paper employs three risk measures, bankruptcy risk, market risk,
and financial reporting risk. To measure bankruptcy risk, I utilize several financial ratios that are commonly
used to analyze bankruptcy risk by banks. These ratios include asset growth, profitability, activity, capital structure,
and liquidity. For the market risk, I use stock market volatility. For the financial reporting risk, I use abnormal
accruals.
I compare the auditor switching firms with the control firms. For the auditor switching firms, I find higher bankruptcy
risk that would be indicated by the lower increase in asset size and profitability, higher in leverage, and lower
in current ratio and interest coverage ratio than for the control firms. The market risk was much higher for the
auditor switching firms than for the control firms. However, I am not able to find higher financial reporting risk
for the auditor switching firms than for
the control firms.