A hitchhiker's guide to dielectric cavities*
Light's growing weight
You don't need a great deal of imagination to foresee an increasing
significance of lightwave technology in data processing and
telecommunications. Here are some arguments in favor of light:
Miniaturization of electronic circuits leads to increased resistances
and hence larger dissipation. Photons don't suffer from losses in the
same
degree because their interaction is much weaker than that of
electrons.
The
speed of light in a dielectric is much larger than the propagation
speed
of electronic signals in metals. The bandwidths available for signal
transmission are a few hundred kHz on copper cables, versus roughly a
THz
in a typical glass fiber - even now it is feasible to carry half a
million telephone conversations over a single glass fiber. Photons are
the
method of choice for massively parallel data processing and storage.
A more specific example of how microphotonics can make an impact
is described in
this PDF-article describing my field of work in the photonics industry
from May 2000 until August 2001. The material system discussed
there
Indium Phosphide, a semiconductor compound. Other material systems for
microphotonics can be found among polymers, glasses, porous media - to
name
a few.
At the
heart of these developments is the availability of small but efficient
lasers which deliver the required intense and coherent light.
Microlaser design
All of us (physicists) have probably been "exposed" to the He-Ne laser
in
some
graduate student lab. But of course the most ubiquitous lasers are by
now
the
semiconductor diode lasers. Both of these incarnations rely on the
parallel-mirror configuration to provide the feedback that makes laser
action possible. This type of resonator is also known from the
Fabry-Perot
interferometer.
Trapping light with interference
One common way of making especially good parallel mirrors is to use
Bragg reflection at multiple layers of dielectric films. See, e.g., the
Wikipedia entry on
"Vertical-Cavity Surface
Emitting
Lasers".
The Bragg principle
is based on the destructive interference between waves in
successive layers
of a stack of dielectric layers.
As a rather logical continuation of the same principle, one has
progressed
to
photonic crystals which employ the Bragg principle in more than
one
spatial direction and can in principle be used to make extremely small
photonic cavities. The price one pays is that one needs many periods
of
the artificial crystal lattice in order to obtain high reflectivities,
so
that the
total size of the structure ends up being much larger than the cavity
itself. Higher and higher reflectivities are required, on the other
hand,
if one wants to make a laser out of such a microcavity. The
simple
reason is that a small cavity can host only a small amount of
amplifying
material, and therefore it becomes more difficult for amplification to
win
over the losses in a microcavity laser.
Whispering-gallery resonators - trapping without
interference
In solid-state laser materials, it is often possible to realize the
mirrors
simply by exploiting total internal reflection at the interface
between
the high-index solid and the surrounding medium (e.g., air).
In contrast to the Bragg principle, this confinement mechanism for
light is to lowest order frequency-independent and can therefore be
called
a classical effect - it can be described
without
explicit use of the
wave nature of light, by using Fermat's principle.
This is good because it means that a device based on this confinement
mechanism will in principle be able to work over a very broad range of
wavelengths - in stark contrast to photonic crystals. Nevertheless,
one
can
use total internal reflection to make three-dimensionally confined
resonators with high frequency selectivity (or
"finesse"), provided one can force wavefronts
inside the cavity to interfere with themselves.
This is achieved with the "whispering-gallery" resonator
which is at the heart of the lowest-threshold lasers made so far. This
low
threshold becomes possible as a consequence of the small size that can
be
achieved with these resonators. They are essentially circular disks in
which the light circulates around close to the dielectric
interface. Such
modes are especially low in losses.
Whispering-gallery waves:
To illustrate the whispering-gallery effect, the movie shows a cross sectional view of a curved interface (black circle) between glass and air, with a circulating wave radiating in all directions.
The color represents the electric field, and in the first animation the field inside the resonator is only slightly higher than outside. This is not a good resonator because it is very "lossy".
In the second movie, the wavelength is about 4 times shorter than above. In this case, the field outside the resonator is much weaker than inside it, meaning that we are confining the light much better. In both animations, the wave fronts look slanted, especially on the outside. Comparing the two clips, you will notice, however, that the wave fronts right at the circular interface are perfectly radial in the bottom image. This is what makes the two scenarios different: the straight wave fronts at the interface correspond to grazing propagation along the curved boundary.
There is still a wave emanating from the cavity at the bottom, but its amplitude relative to that at the interface is now much smaller. Observe also the central region of the dielectric circle, which is essentially field-free. The intensity is highly concentrated near the surface.
|  |
 |
Semiconductors are far from being the only application of the
whispering-gallery mechanism. The first laser resonators in the
submillimeter size regime were made of
liquid droplets containing a lasing
organic dye. The highest-quality optical microresonators have been
achieved using fused-silica spheres (i.e., glass). Although these
materials have a refractive index closer to unity than a
semiconductor,
they still support whispering-gallery modes. In that context, they are
often called morphology-dependent resonances (MDRs).
Both the semiconductor and the droplet realizations of the whispering
gallery are illustrated on the cover of

Optical
Processes in Microcavities, edited by R.K.Chang and A.J.Campillo
(World Scientific Publishers, 1996).
The lasing droplets are seen on the left side, and a "thumbtack"
microlaser
with its rotationally symmetric calculated emission pattern appears in
the main panel.
Remark:
This book contains 11 chapters on important experimental and
theoretical
aspects of dielectric microcavities. Chapter 11 represents the status
of
our work as of summer 1995:
"Chaotic Light: a theory of asymmetric
cavity resonators",
J.U.Nöckel and A.D.Stone
PDF - (warning: large files)
|
Don't be square!
The question that arises naturally in lasing microdroplets is: how
strongly can a dielectric resonator be deformed before
whispering-gallery modes cease to exist, or become degraded by
leakage? The intuitive answer is, "the rounder, the
better". However, even shapes with sharp corners can sustain
modes that have every right to be called whispering-gallery
phenomena. In fact, these types of whispering-gallery modes cannot be
understood purely on the basis of ray optics. This is discussed in our
work on hexagonal nanoporous microlasers.
Intriguingly, hexagonal zinc oxide
nanocrystals have recently become the smallest
resonators sustaining whispering-gallery type modes ever
observed.
|